We all know the ongoing “original book vs. film adaptation franchise” discourse, but will there ever be a right, right answer? Well, we have to say that it all depends on which series we are talking about. Let’s get Percy Jackson For example the series, in which the film adaptations were so terrible that the film series did not get a chance to extend it beyond the first two book adaptations.
However, take another example like Hungry game, In which both book series And The film adaptations were met with high reviews by quite a few critics, and there are reasonable arguments on both sides of the debate as to whether books or movies are better. Well, the decision is for where the maze Runner Chain? Do the movies compare to the original book series? Well, let’s take a look at some comparisons here.
Books vs movies
the maze Runner The films were based on the original book series written by James Dashner. The series consists of five books including the maze Runner, Scorching test, Treatment of death, And two prequel novels titled Scorching test, treatment of death And Fever code. There is also a novel for the series titled Crank Palace Also a separate book titled Maze runner files. A second novel is also reportedly currently in the works.
the maze Runner The Movies franchise only includes adaptations for the first three books, and is titled the maze Runner, Maze Runner: Scorching Test, And The Maze Runner: The Death Cure. The film series has some notable talents such as Dylan O’Brien, Kaya Scodelario, Thomas Brody-Sangster, Key Hong Lee, Will Poulter, Dexter Darden, and more. Wes Ball has directed all three films of the franchise.
So are movies worth watching if you’ve already read the maze Runner Books, and vice versa? And overall, which version is better, print or screen version? Well, although both are clearly based on the same story and plot, there are some differences between the two that make both of them worth consuming. Let’s take a look at some of the biggest contradictions here. However we will warn you: Too many spoilers ahead!
Difference between movies and books
For now, we are only going to take a look at the biggest contrasting elements between the first film and the first book, as there are already a lot of differences in the solo. However, we must say, if you have either not seen the film or have not read the book and you do not know what the plot is, then you will not understand a single word from here.
For those who have either done it or however, let’s start. So the difference is that in the film, Thomas already begins to have blurred memories of his past life right off the bat. After re-learning their names, they already have previous darshans with a consistent voice in their head saying “wicked is good”. Teresa also does not spend much of the time in a coma-like state, and she wakes up in the film almost immediately upon her arrival.
This is certainly necessary for screenwriters to abbreviate the plot for the length of a watchable film. The other notable difference is that Albie and Thomas get along quite well in the movies, the serum is much less accessible than the books to protect against severe sting, and Thomas and Teresa are not really telepathic in the films. Thank goodness though, because the voiceover would probably have been laughable for this.
These are, of course, some of the many differences between the maze Runner Movies vs the maze Runner Books series. So now, for the final question: Are books or movies worth it? Well, we must say that all three films received critics with some mixed reviews, but at the same time it received some relatively high reviews from general audiences.
The films were praised for their fast-paced action, twist and turn, and the cast was known for their outstanding performances. So we must say that our answer is that both are works of art which are definitely consumable. What are you waiting for now? Go and enjoy Maze runner seriess, whether you choose movies or books!