• About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Post A News
Haviknowledge
  • Technology & Research
  • Entertainment
  • Pollywood
  • Wiki/Bio
  • Knowledge
  • How To
No Result
View All Result
  • Technology & Research
  • Entertainment
  • Pollywood
  • Wiki/Bio
  • Knowledge
  • How To
No Result
View All Result
Haviknowledge
No Result
View All Result

Why is Harvie Weinstein trying to appeal the verdict of her #MeToo case? – Haviknowledge

havi by havi
April 7, 2021
A A
0
Why is Harvie Weinstein trying to appeal the verdict of her #MeToo case?  - Film Daily

Ever since Harvey Weinstein was accused of sexual harassment and rape in 2018, his case has been at the heart of the #MeToo movement. And with many twists and turns in his case, some are wondering if he will ever come out of jail. Now, the Weinstein case is trying to appeal the decision itself. Here we know everything about new developments.

Contents hide
1 A possible haze
2 Are there other possible examples of mistrial in the case?
3 Will Harvey Weinstein be released on bail?
4 What else is Harvey Weinstein’s defense team saying?

A possible haze

On Monday, ex-filmmaker Harvey Weinstein filed an appeal for his recent conviction of sexual assault and rape, claiming that his trial was rigged on the basis of this appeal. According to Weinstein’s lawyer Barry Cummins, the judge should have replaced Juror 11, because he had previously written a novel with themes of sexual abuse, and was therefore biased.

According to the Mysterious Brief, Zuar, in his novel, interpreted them as “myths” about the subject matter at the close of the trial, which Cummins understood. Briefly Explains: “Probably most disturbing, defense attorney discovered an article the Atlantic Featuring juror number 11 [her book] Age of Consent as a ‘deeply personal story’, suggesting that the book was, at least in part, autobiographical.

The brief continues: “This admission raised even more questions about whether juror number 11 had concealed information about his own experiences with ‘sexually victimized men’ as impartial and impartial gamblers” Could have affected his ability to serve and whether he had answered these questions honestly on the juror questionnaire.

Are there other possible examples of mistrial in the case?

Harvey Weinstein’s attorneys are also complaining that several women were brought in to testify against the former producer, despite not being charged. Women testifying included Don Dunning, Tarley Wolf and Lauren Young.

Dinning told the court that Weinstein had nonchalantly touched her genitals during a work meeting, and later, if he promised to participate in a threesome with her, offered her his film work. Had.

Wolf was also charged with several charges against Weinstein. She told the court that Business Mogul had masturbated and raped her in her New York apartment in front of the business in which she worked.

But Winstein’s lawyer did not feel that these charges should be taken seriously in a court of law. “Mr. C. Weinstein was tried not only for the criminal acts alleged in the indictment, but also for the alleged behavior that manifested licentiousness in his relationships with women.”

Will Harvey Weinstein be released on bail?

When an appeal was filed for Harvey Weinstein’s case, Barry Cummins argued that Weinstein should be released on bail while everything was being settled. Unfortunately for Weinstein, however, this request was denied.

Cummins argued that Weinstein was released on the grounds that juror 11 was dishonest when answering selection questions. She argued that she “effectively became a People’s Health Expert on the Jury, an informal inquiry into how women are treated after sexual abuse by older men.”

He stated that “not only did Juar No. 11 take part in the deliberations that obstructed the judicial process, but it alone perished.”

What else is Harvey Weinstein’s defense team saying?

Harvey Weinstein’s defense team claimed that he is not only a victim of a deprivation, but also of character assassination. “Sad for Mr. Weinstein”, argued the team in a statement, “The trial court’s sentence does not reflect Mr. Weinstein, the man, and the conduct for which he was convicted, but Mr. Weinstein Media Villain. On.”

The statement asks people “what a [then] A 68-year-old man by any other name, without a criminal record, a lifetime of professional contributions to his field; A unique history of charitable work; And severe medical conditions would have been sentenced to harsher punishment for an act in which there was no violence and no injury to the complainants, and where both complainants continued to have voluntary sex with the defendant. “

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Post A News
© All Rights Reserved to www.haviknowledge.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Technology & Research
  • Entertainment
  • Pollywood
  • Wiki/Bio
  • Knowledge
  • How To

© All Rights Reserved to www.haviknowledge.com

x